CIVIL LAW:DAMAGES; MERE FILING OF A COMPLAINT IS NOT PER SE EVIDENCE OF ILL WILL ON WHICH A CLAIM FOR DAMGES MAY BE BASED.
It has not been sufficiently established that the complaint they filed was intended merely to harass and place petitioner  in disrepute as they apparently were pursuing a cause of action they sincerely believed was meritorious. The fact that they have failed does not necessarily mean that they were acting in bad faith. The mere filing of a complaint against a person, while it may cause him some anxiety, is not per se evidence of ill will on which a claim for damages may be based. A contrary role would discourage peaceful recourse to the courts of justice and induce resort to methods less than legal, and perhaps even violent. 
CRIMINAL LAW:RAPE; ESSENTIAL THAT FORCE USED IS SUFFICIENT TO CONSUMATE PURPOSE; ABSENCE OF PHYSICAL INJURIES DOES NOT NEGATE ITS COMMISSION.
It need not be over-emphasized that force or violence required in rape cases is relative. When applied, it need not be too overpowering or irresistible. What is essential is that the force used is sufficient to consummate the purpose for which the offender had in mind or to bring about the desired result. In fact, even the absence of external signs of physical injuries does not negate the commission of the crime of rape.
REMEDIAL LAW:DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAUSE OF ACTION AND ACTION.
A cause of action is the fact or combination of facts which affords a party a right to judicial interference in his behalf. An action means an ordinary suit in a court of justice, by which one party prosecutes another for the enforcement or protection of a right, or the prosecution or redress of a wrong. 
LABOR LAW:STRIKES; EFFECT OF ASSUMPTION/CERTIFICATION ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF LABOR.
We also wish to point out that an assumption and/or certification order of the Secretary of Labor automatically results in a return-to-work of all striking workers, whether or not a corresponding order has been issued by the Secretary of Labor. Thus, the striking workers erred when they continued with their strike alleging absence of a return-to-work order. Article 264(g) is clear, once an assumption/certification order is issued, strikes are enjoined, or if one has already taken place, all strikers shall immediately return to work.
COMMERCIAL LAW:FOREIGN CORPORATIONS; PURPOSE IN REQUIRING A LICENSE TO DO BUSINESS IN THE PHILIPPINES.
The purpose of the rule requiring foreign corporations to secure a license to do business in the Philippines is to enable us to exercise jurisdiction over them for the regulation of their activities in this country. If a foreign corporation operates in the Philippines without submitting to our laws, it is only just that it not be allowed to invoke them in our courts when it should need them later for its own protection. While foreign investors are always welcome in this land to collaborate with us for our mutual benefit, they must be prepared as an indispensable condition to respect and be bound by Philippine law in proper cases, as in the one at bar.
Read other Legal Briefs!